tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2836339018444123313.post2558198570049165206..comments2023-09-14T21:37:39.544-07:00Comments on U.S. Budget and Economy: Did the Assault Weapons Ban Work? (Part 2)R Davishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00681139511824861368noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2836339018444123313.post-33963541295896232452013-01-29T00:02:12.694-08:002013-01-29T00:02:12.694-08:00Or how about I claim that it's been proven to ...Or how about I claim that it's been proven to be effective without presenting the proof? Of course you would be correct to ignore that claim and/or to demand proof. The same goes with Kopel's and DeFranco's claims. The only way to prove something is to test it. Hence, we need to come up with rational restrictions that don't unduly infringe on an individual's right to defend themselves.<br />R Davishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00681139511824861368noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2836339018444123313.post-73932369298558814572013-01-28T15:14:21.797-08:002013-01-28T15:14:21.797-08:00In any event, we should ignore claims of proof by ...<i>In any event, we should ignore claims of proof by people like Kopel and DeFranco unless and until that proof is presented.</i><br /><br />Or how about we don't institute a ban until you can prove that it will be effective.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com